It identifies the human researcher as the primary interpretive instrument, uniquely capable of negotiation and document analysis.
The work aligns closely with democratic and participatory models of evaluation, focusing on equity and inclusion for those impacted by research findings. The Constructivist Credo
Lincoln and Guba maintain that the constructivist paradigm is fundamentally distinct from quantitative or scientific inquiry, though they acknowledge that mixed methods can add context. Context and Legacy It identifies the human researcher as the primary