2022---fischst-bchen-im--ko-test--beliebte-marken-fallen-durch [TRUSTED × 2024]

Limiting consumption of breaded, pre-fried products for children, as they are most vulnerable to 3-MCPD exposure.

Several brands contained elevated levels of 3-MCPD, a contaminant that forms during the industrial processing of fats and oils (used in the breading). The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies 3-MCPD as "possibly carcinogenic to humans." Both brands stood out for their lack of

. Both brands stood out for their lack of harmful contaminants and their superior commitment to sustainable fishing and supply chain transparency. Conclusion and Consumer Recommendations This private label also failed the test, receiving

The test results were particularly damaging for market leaders. While generic "store brands" often performed surprisingly well, the "big names" struggled. the "big names" struggled.

This private label also failed the test, receiving a "Poor" rating due to mineral oil residues.

Paying attention to the source of the fish (looking for Pacific Pollack from sustainable stocks).

While most brands used MSC-certified fish, the test found that "certified" did not always equate to "sustainable" in practice. Brands often lacked transparency regarding the exact catch methods and the specific fishing grounds used. Performance of Major Brands